Artistic representation of a legal settlement in the music industry.
Want to target the right audience? Sponsor our site and choose your specific industry to connect with a relevant audience.
Prominent brand mentions across targeted, industry-focused articles
High-visibility placements that speak directly to an engaged local audience
Guaranteed coverage that maximizes exposure and reinforces your brand presence
Interested in seeing what sponsored content looks like on our platform?
May’s Roofing & Contracting
Forwal Construction
NSC Clips
Real Internet Sales
Suited
Florida4Golf
Click the button below to sponsor our articles:
Sponsor Our ArticlesDrake has settled his legal issues with iHeartMedia regarding the diss track ‘Not Like Us’ by Kendrick Lamar. The dispute began when Drake accused the company of accepting illegal payments from Universal Music Group to promote the track. Though details of the settlement remain confidential, Drake’s legal challenges against UMG continue, suggesting an ongoing feud in the music industry.
In a big turn of events from San Antonio, Texas, Drake has settled his legal dispute with iHeartMedia concerning the contentious diss track “Not Like Us” by Kendrick Lamar. This settlement was officially confirmed through court records and made public on February 28, 2025. It looks like Drake is putting this chapter behind him, at least with iHeartMedia.
This whole saga kicked off in November 2024 when Drake filed a legal petition alleging that iHeartMedia was partaking in some not-so-good practices by taking illegal payments from Universal Music Group (UMG) to bolster radio play for Lamar’s diss track. It’s worth noting that UMG is the record label for both artists, which adds an extra layer of intrigue to this story.
Initially, Drake’s legal team was eager to dig deeper. They aimed to get depositions from people connected to both iHeartMedia and UMG to further understand the questionable practices they claimed were happening behind closed doors. Fast forward to today, and Drake’s representatives have announced they reached an “amicable resolution of the dispute,” yet they have kept the finer details of this settlement under wraps. iHeartMedia has chosen to remain tight-lipped, opting not to comment on the matter when approached.
As it stands, the legal drama isn’t over yet. The claims against UMG are still looming large, with a hearing on a motion to dismiss scheduled for March 5, 2025, in San Antonio. Drake has accused UMG of engaging in “irregular and inappropriate business practices” around the airplay for “Not Like Us.” The petition raises some serious allegations, claiming that UMG was aware of the diss track’s damaging content towards Drake, including false accusations implicating him in horrific crimes such as being a sex offender.
Adding another layer to this legal tussle, Drake took a step further in January 2025 by filing a separate defamation lawsuit against UMG in federal court in New York City. This lawsuit concerns the same damaging allegations laid out in “Not Like Us.” It’s important to note that Kendrick Lamar is not named in this particular defamation case, perhaps indicating that Drake is aiming his legal arrows directly at the label rather than his fellow artist.
The rift between Drake and Lamar has escalated into one of the most discussed feuds in hip-hop culture over the past few years. With both artists at the pinnacle of their game, fans have closely followed any developments, eager to see how this drama would unfold.
Meanwhile, this entire situation has captured the interest of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which is conducting an investigation to determine if iHeartMedia has been coercing musicians to perform for lower pay at their events in exchange for favorable airplay on their radio stations. iHeartMedia has denied allegations, asserting they do not engage in any such agreements concerning airplay related to events.
This dramatic turn of events signals a significant moment not just for Drake, but for the entire music industry as it contemplates transparency and fair practices. Fans are certainly left on the edge of their seats, wondering what will happen next as the legal disputes continue and the drama unfolds in the public eye.
News Summary The San Antonio City Council is considering allocating an additional $100,000 from the…
News Summary The San Antonio Spurs will navigate a challenging season without head coach Gregg…
News Summary In response to rising measles cases in Texas, San Antonio organized a successful…
News Summary In a devastating incident in Pleasanton, Texas, two teenage brothers, 14-year-old Mesiah Rangel…
News Summary San Antonio is set to welcome Candy Cloud, a beverage shop originating from…
News Summary The CEO of a San Antonio trucking company testified before the U.S. Senate…