San Antonio Voters Face City Charter Amendments
As San Antonio gears up for a big voting day, where you’ll cast your ballot for the highest office in the land, don’t overlook what’s lurking at the bottom of that ballot. Yes, we’re talking about the proposed changes to the City Charter. These amendments are a bit like a hidden treasure chest that may not be as shiny as they sound. So, grab your voting guides as we dive into what’s at stake!
What’s on the Ballot?
This year, San Antonio voters will see a total of six proposed City Charter amendments. Now, let’s get to the heart of the matter: many believe these changes may not be in the best interest of the public. An advocate for voters, Greg Brockhouse, who previously served on the City Council, is urging citizens to vote against all six proposals. He emphasizes that, while some changes might appear beneficial, they fall short of what San Antonio residents deserve in terms of transparency and civic impact.
Proposition C: A Closer Look
One particular amendment, Proposition C, is stirring quite a bit of conversation. This measure aims to reverse a previous charter amendment made in 2018 that set limits on the pay and tenure of the city manager. Remember when then-City Manager Sheryl Sculley had a staggering salary of around $475,000? Well, folks, that’s precisely what the city is trying to avoid returning to!
Brockhouse, who was a lone voice supporting those limits back in 2018, argues that keeping salary in check and capping tenure at eight years was a smart move to ensure a **fair compensation structure** across the board for all city employees. By tying the city manager’s salary to ten times that of the lowest-paid employee, it makes sure that no one gets left behind. “In what world would we talk about pay equity if it weren’t for this effort?” he asks.
What’s at Stake with Other Propositions?
But wait, there’s more. Proposition E is looking to give City Council members a hefty 53% pay raise and a 42% increase for the mayor. On the surface, it seems like a straightforward ask, right? But it raises eyebrows when we consider that city staff are only getting single-digit raises currently. Is it fair for elected officials to ask for sizable increases while fighting with first responders about their compensation? It seems a bit contradictory.
Brockhouse suggests that a two-year term for council members would allow constituents to hold their leaders accountable more frequently. Longer terms might lead to a disconnect with the community. It begs the question: do we want politicians who are entrenched and less focused on what matters most to us?
Community Impact and Financial Resources
Interestingly, the only amendment that seems to get the attention of the business community is the one impacting the city manager’s salary. There’s a good amount of funding—around $1 million—to push this item forward. Why is so much money being funneled into this particular proposal? It’s a good question to ask as we consider the transparency of our government.
Brockhouse believes we should go back to the drawing board instead of hurrying to push these amendments through. He suggests finding *sustainable solutions* instead of using resources for potentially unnecessary changes within the City Charter. “If we can allocate millions for a baseball stadium or the Spurs, surely, we can find ways to support those who truly need assistance.”
Conclusion: A Call to Vote
So, San Antonio, as you prepare to cast your vote, keep these amendments in mind. With so much at stake regarding the City Charter, let’s focus on voting down these proposals. Let’s ensure our ballot reflects our values and priorities, keeping in mind the importance of transparency, fairness, and accountability in our leadership.
It’s time to make our voices heard. Make your vote count!
